I still think Nick Pope is a disinfo agent for MI5.
This video, which I need to find on YouTube if it's there, could be pretty interesting. There's only a still from it in this article, unless my corporate firewall is blocking the YouTube link -- always a possibility.
1.26.2010
1.08.2010
a total of 11 objects seen in Stigler, Oklahoma
some interesting daytime photos from Stigler, Oklahoma, reportedly seen January 1, 2010.
direct link to the .wmv file is here.
direct link to the .wmv file is here.
Labels:
central US,
daylight sightings,
photo evidence
12.23.2009
plane captured by ufo on video? Hmm....
It is very difficult to believe this video is not fake, but the poster has a good story behind it and I don't have the gear nor the time to examine the video in depth, but at the first few viewings it's hard to see anything obviously fake except that the content seems too good to be true. But I present it in the interests of keeping an open mind.
Pretty nifty night footage from Chile 120609
Some really amazing nighttime footage from Chile, if this was faked the photog should get an oscar, really.
Several lights, at times seeming like part of or or two larger objects, but then clearly operating independently and then combining with each other again differently before moving off, really fascinating video...
Labels:
fleet,
nightime sightings,
video evidence
12.21.2009
giant triangle UFO hovers over red square for hours!
This edited-down version has 3 different videos of the Moscow Triangle, along with snide British commentary and cheezy techno music...
12.07.2009
China Spiral same as in Norway?
I was ready to believe the Russian Rocket story for the Norway Spiral, until I came across the CHINESE spirals, right around the same time, as far as I can tell -- it's all in Chinese! Some Mandarin speaker want to clue us in on what's being said?
Also, some documentary about the China Spiral, with some good spiral images though I'm not sure if they're 'reconstructions' or authentic....
And here's some interesting footage of the Norway spiral:
I have to say, the 'tail' at the lower right corner lends credence to the rocket theory, but the video says at one point in the caption that there was a similar object in January 2009! So the Russians had the same problem twice? Hmm...
Here's some more Norway spiral stuff, mostly stills.
AND, here's a spiral UFO video from Russia from 2006? Is 'spiral' a new UFO type?
Interestingly, a lot of the UFO/Conspiracy sites are claiming this is evidence of a test of Project Blue Beam, which is technology designed to project giant images into the sky to fool people into believing in the Anti-Christ or some such, pulling in HAARP and other stuff....I hadn't heard of Project Blue Beam before....
Also, some documentary about the China Spiral, with some good spiral images though I'm not sure if they're 'reconstructions' or authentic....
And here's some interesting footage of the Norway spiral:
I have to say, the 'tail' at the lower right corner lends credence to the rocket theory, but the video says at one point in the caption that there was a similar object in January 2009! So the Russians had the same problem twice? Hmm...
Here's some more Norway spiral stuff, mostly stills.
AND, here's a spiral UFO video from Russia from 2006? Is 'spiral' a new UFO type?
Interestingly, a lot of the UFO/Conspiracy sites are claiming this is evidence of a test of Project Blue Beam, which is technology designed to project giant images into the sky to fool people into believing in the Anti-Christ or some such, pulling in HAARP and other stuff....I hadn't heard of Project Blue Beam before....
11.29.2009
10.31.2009
'65 photo proven authentic

one of the most convincing series of photos ever taken of a UFO was the set of 4 taken by Rex Heflin in Texas in 1965, using a Polaroid camera.
The latest analysis supports the idea that the photos were not faked in any way.
Labels:
daylight sightings,
photo evidence,
Southeastern US
10.11.2009
strange russian cloud ring
this could possibly be some sort of bizarre ultra-rare weather phenomenon, but it's unusual enough that I thought I'd post it....
Labels:
cloud disruption,
daylight sightings,
video evidence
10.06.2009
Lonnie Zamora Socorro Sighting A Hoax?
Although extremely old news (40+ years!), the Soccorro sighting, you know, the one where the deputy saw two beings leap into a craft and take off, has always been super controversial.
Here's some evidence that it was hoaxed, supposedly. These old dudes say they did it, as part of this 'culture of pranksterism' at NM Tech. And since they're old, why would they lie?
I don't deny that Socorro was a hoax, nor do I necessarily believe that it wasn't. But whether or not these hoaxers existed, which they apparently did, and whether or not they had a fondness for hoaxing UFO's, which they also apparently did, it doesn't say how they managed to get the UFO that Zamora saw to turn green and shoot off into the sky, which is what he's always said it did.
Here's some evidence that it was hoaxed, supposedly. These old dudes say they did it, as part of this 'culture of pranksterism' at NM Tech. And since they're old, why would they lie?
I don't deny that Socorro was a hoax, nor do I necessarily believe that it wasn't. But whether or not these hoaxers existed, which they apparently did, and whether or not they had a fondness for hoaxing UFO's, which they also apparently did, it doesn't say how they managed to get the UFO that Zamora saw to turn green and shoot off into the sky, which is what he's always said it did.
Labels:
alien encounters,
hoax,
physical evidence
9.13.2009
triangle footage
I've been remiss in posting the last couple months, the recession is kicking my ass and I've been concentrating on staying afloat. But I hope to post more here in the near future, maybe even get the Drupal site up I've been threatening for ages. Drupal will let me organize the site better, so I can put some real value-add to the UFO stuff, and hopefully stand out from amidst the many many UFO blogs out there.
How you ask? By starting to draw the connections and organizing the information in a useful way, with the intent that it all get rated, connected, and contextualized, which is the only way any scientific light will ever be shed using the evidence we have so far. Skeptics will continue to argue each and every individual sighting, no matter if it's on radar or 10,000 people see it, and so trotting out sighting after sighting is pointless. What the UFO community should be going after at this point in time, after 60+ years of sightings, pix, videos, etc. is how to put all this information together in ways that will allow any patterns to emerge, and for connections to be made.
We need to put all the data we have so far in its proper place according to time and date, relevant geospatial data, the type of objects or whatever seen, and the type and number of witnesses and other evidence, so we can make correlations across the data and see if we can prove via scientific statistical means that there is something going on, or once and for all if it all is just mass hysteria, Venus, and swamp gas.
As pompous and arrogant as it may sound, I hope to start to do that with the Drupal version of Dimension22, which I hope to have time to do one of these days. I've got the site installed, I basically just need to build a nifty template for it, do the taxonomy and the rss feeds, and start the laborious process of adding the content, both from this temporary blog as well as all the on- and offline stuff I've been wanting to post.
I've got a huge backlog of stuff to put up, that I hope I can someday get to, but in the meantime, here's some interesting nighttime footage of something with non-standard blinking lights and of considerable apparent size, as far as can be ascertained.
Hard to tell what it is, but it's pretty clear what it isn't -- a helicopter or plane, unless it's one with really illegal lights!
How you ask? By starting to draw the connections and organizing the information in a useful way, with the intent that it all get rated, connected, and contextualized, which is the only way any scientific light will ever be shed using the evidence we have so far. Skeptics will continue to argue each and every individual sighting, no matter if it's on radar or 10,000 people see it, and so trotting out sighting after sighting is pointless. What the UFO community should be going after at this point in time, after 60+ years of sightings, pix, videos, etc. is how to put all this information together in ways that will allow any patterns to emerge, and for connections to be made.
We need to put all the data we have so far in its proper place according to time and date, relevant geospatial data, the type of objects or whatever seen, and the type and number of witnesses and other evidence, so we can make correlations across the data and see if we can prove via scientific statistical means that there is something going on, or once and for all if it all is just mass hysteria, Venus, and swamp gas.
As pompous and arrogant as it may sound, I hope to start to do that with the Drupal version of Dimension22, which I hope to have time to do one of these days. I've got the site installed, I basically just need to build a nifty template for it, do the taxonomy and the rss feeds, and start the laborious process of adding the content, both from this temporary blog as well as all the on- and offline stuff I've been wanting to post.
I've got a huge backlog of stuff to put up, that I hope I can someday get to, but in the meantime, here's some interesting nighttime footage of something with non-standard blinking lights and of considerable apparent size, as far as can be ascertained.
Hard to tell what it is, but it's pretty clear what it isn't -- a helicopter or plane, unless it's one with really illegal lights!
Labels:
black triangles,
nightime sightings,
video evidence
8.07.2009
some video evidence of crop circles in the midst of being formed?

I don't usually post stuff on crop circles, as fascinating as they are, because since so many English Tossers think it's amusing to hoax them, the field (no pun intended) is even more fraught with false leads than the rest of UFOlogy.
But this one was pretty interesting. You can see two flashes of light, and then if you look closely, some dark things of some sort moving around in the field.
The setup for filming was pretty sophisticated, using 4 IR cameras for parallax, and then another dude went and filmed the same area during the daytime to make sure that it matched up. An intricate, 'woven' crop circle was discovered in that same spot the next morning, with the wheat apparently interleaved like a basket!
Check out the videos (there are several) at the link in the title...
Labels:
alien beings,
crop circles,
video evidence
7.06.2009
Mexico yellow orb releases numerous child orbs!
This recent video from Mexico is truly astounding, and I am at a loss how these could be explained away. It's got lots of reference points in continuous video, and shows multiple self-luminous objects zipping about clearly under some sort of control. Furthermore, scores of these luminous objects appear to come from the central object, and even those that don't simply appear from out of nothing! Really neat stuff. How come Mexico gets all the nifty ones? ;)
7.05.2009
star-shaped video from Brazil
found this posted on YouTube, posted from Atibaia city in São Paulo, Brazil:
6.27.2009
spinning triangle thingy over Amsterdam, Netherlands!
This video, if authentic -- which I doubt -- is pretty nifty. It shows some weirdo object spinning over a city (presumably Amsterdam), that then takes off amazingly quickly, doing a nice STNG flash thing. Pretty good fake though, IMHO, although I'd love to be proved wrong about this one (about the fake part)....
two similar quasi-invisible airborne circles
by themselves, neither one of these reports is all that interesting, but I find it curious that within a couple of days of each other, there are these two reports that are so similar as to be very eerie. Both are very subtle circles hanging motionless in the sky, hardly visible....
The first is the one from Kings Dominion, VA, which actually has some video to go with it.
The second, is a single photo that only showed a strange circle when the photographer was looking over his photos after uploading.
By themselves, either of these could be easily dismissed as whatever, but these are 3 days apart, this particular one from Texas. I just found that curious enough to post both of these as a potentially related phenomenon.
Also if you poke around the YouTube video some, you'll find this one, which shows some other similar rings from previous decades, with some more discussion on the 1957 sighting available at UFOCasebook.
The first is the one from Kings Dominion, VA, which actually has some video to go with it.
The second, is a single photo that only showed a strange circle when the photographer was looking over his photos after uploading.
By themselves, either of these could be easily dismissed as whatever, but these are 3 days apart, this particular one from Texas. I just found that curious enough to post both of these as a potentially related phenomenon.
Also if you poke around the YouTube video some, you'll find this one, which shows some other similar rings from previous decades, with some more discussion on the 1957 sighting available at UFOCasebook.
6.18.2009
3 crisp daytime flying triangle photos

these 3 photos are really sharp and clear; what isn't clear is whether they are something otherworldly or just really advanced military technology...
They were taken in Greenville, South Carolina
flying mexican humanoid thingy -- WTF?
ok this is totally whack. It's all in spanish so i have little enough idea of what the hell they're saying, but the video is definitely a strange one....
lots more weird stuff here too: http://www.para-tube.com
Labels:
south and central America,
video evidence
6.10.2009
some amazing alleged NASA footage of crashed ancient spacecraft on the moon?
Part I of the footage; includes an audio overlay of the already famous interview with Apollo Astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell, already included in a previous post. The first 7 minutes include some of the harder-to-explain-away space shuttle footage of odd things, including my personal favorite, the one where the object makes a 270 degree turn, accelerates away, and is followed by a flash of light as if something on the ground shot at it; how exactly is that space junk or a camera flare, pray tell?
Part II is IMHO much less convincing, but equally interesting, video/audio combinations, dealing primarily with John Lear, and partly (although sadly cut off) with Richard Hoagland of Face-On-Mars fame. Hoagland is somebody who I actually met, having helped a pal videotape one of his presentations a few years back. While Hoagland has some interesting stuff to talk about, particularly regarding the supposed giant structures on the moon, he's kind of a dick as a person - or he was to me and my pal - which may not have any bearing on the validity of what he's talking about, but makes it more difficult for me to believe him. IMHO assholes are more likely to be big fat liars than non-assholes; purely an emotional bias, I freely admit. I shouldn't confuse the messenger with the message. However I always thought the Face On Mars was hokum. I don't know anything about Lear (if I'm even spelling his name correctly) though I'll try to research him some more in a future post.
part III starts out and ends with the famous Mexican Air Force IR video, which to my thinking is as solid a proof as you could possibly ask for -- objects invisible to the naked eye, captured by military-quality infrared gear, and seen by numerous qualified air force personnel. I ask you, skeptics, if that's not acceptable evidence, WTF is? What evidence would it take to convince you, if any? My guess is that most skeptics wouldn't believe it if the aliens landed on their garage.
The rest of part III deals with the supposed immanence of Disclosure by the U.S. government, which in an earlier post I expressed my doubt as to its likelihood. Governments have a singular dislike of admitting that they've been wrong, especially arrogant, conceited governments like ours. So don't hold your breath. But I'd love to be proved wrong....
Part II is IMHO much less convincing, but equally interesting, video/audio combinations, dealing primarily with John Lear, and partly (although sadly cut off) with Richard Hoagland of Face-On-Mars fame. Hoagland is somebody who I actually met, having helped a pal videotape one of his presentations a few years back. While Hoagland has some interesting stuff to talk about, particularly regarding the supposed giant structures on the moon, he's kind of a dick as a person - or he was to me and my pal - which may not have any bearing on the validity of what he's talking about, but makes it more difficult for me to believe him. IMHO assholes are more likely to be big fat liars than non-assholes; purely an emotional bias, I freely admit. I shouldn't confuse the messenger with the message. However I always thought the Face On Mars was hokum. I don't know anything about Lear (if I'm even spelling his name correctly) though I'll try to research him some more in a future post.
part III starts out and ends with the famous Mexican Air Force IR video, which to my thinking is as solid a proof as you could possibly ask for -- objects invisible to the naked eye, captured by military-quality infrared gear, and seen by numerous qualified air force personnel. I ask you, skeptics, if that's not acceptable evidence, WTF is? What evidence would it take to convince you, if any? My guess is that most skeptics wouldn't believe it if the aliens landed on their garage.
The rest of part III deals with the supposed immanence of Disclosure by the U.S. government, which in an earlier post I expressed my doubt as to its likelihood. Governments have a singular dislike of admitting that they've been wrong, especially arrogant, conceited governments like ours. So don't hold your breath. But I'd love to be proved wrong....
6.06.2009
Participant reports on the Dulce, NM Conference
Some fascinating reading regarding the heavily attended conference in Dulce, NM about the possibility of an underground alien base or black ops military base, or both, beneath Archuleta Mesa.
Details include multiple witness reports of UFO activity, cattle mutilations, physical evidence of military operations, and perhaps most interestingly, surveillance of conference attendees by unmarked helicopters!
Really worth a look....
Details include multiple witness reports of UFO activity, cattle mutilations, physical evidence of military operations, and perhaps most interestingly, surveillance of conference attendees by unmarked helicopters!
Really worth a look....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)