20 yr old Area 51 photo

yes, I get a lot of stuff from allnewsweb, but having to work for a living I don't always (read, seldom if ever) have the time to do my own independent research. Sigh, maybe when I win the lotto....
anyway, an intriguing and historically relevant photo -- 1990 was when the Bob Lazar story first broke, so A51 was probably still being utilized at that point in time....

a total of 11 objects seen in Stigler, Oklahoma

some interesting daytime photos from Stigler, Oklahoma, reportedly seen January 1, 2010.
direct link to the .wmv file is here.

'65 photo proven authentic

one of the most convincing series of photos ever taken of a UFO was the set of 4 taken by Rex Heflin in Texas in 1965, using a Polaroid camera.

The latest analysis supports the idea that the photos were not faked in any way.

two similar quasi-invisible airborne circles

by themselves, neither one of these reports is all that interesting, but I find it curious that within a couple of days of each other, there are these two reports that are so similar as to be very eerie. Both are very subtle circles hanging motionless in the sky, hardly visible....
The first is the one from Kings Dominion, VA, which actually has some video to go with it.
The second, is a single photo that only showed a strange circle when the photographer was looking over his photos after uploading.
By themselves, either of these could be easily dismissed as whatever, but these are 3 days apart, this particular one from Texas. I just found that curious enough to post both of these as a potentially related phenomenon.
Also if you poke around the YouTube video some, you'll find this one, which shows some other similar rings from previous decades, with some more discussion on the 1957 sighting available at UFOCasebook.

3 crisp daytime flying triangle photos

these 3 photos are really sharp and clear; what isn't clear is whether they are something otherworldly or just really advanced military technology...
They were taken in Greenville, South Carolina

some amazing alleged NASA footage of crashed ancient spacecraft on the moon?

Part I of the footage; includes an audio overlay of the already famous interview with Apollo Astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell, already included in a previous post. The first 7 minutes include some of the harder-to-explain-away space shuttle footage of odd things, including my personal favorite, the one where the object makes a 270 degree turn, accelerates away, and is followed by a flash of light as if something on the ground shot at it; how exactly is that space junk or a camera flare, pray tell?

Part II is IMHO much less convincing, but equally interesting, video/audio combinations, dealing primarily with John Lear, and partly (although sadly cut off) with Richard Hoagland of Face-On-Mars fame. Hoagland is somebody who I actually met, having helped a pal videotape one of his presentations a few years back. While Hoagland has some interesting stuff to talk about, particularly regarding the supposed giant structures on the moon, he's kind of a dick as a person - or he was to me and my pal - which may not have any bearing on the validity of what he's talking about, but makes it more difficult for me to believe him. IMHO assholes are more likely to be big fat liars than non-assholes; purely an emotional bias, I freely admit. I shouldn't confuse the messenger with the message. However I always thought the Face On Mars was hokum. I don't know anything about Lear (if I'm even spelling his name correctly) though I'll try to research him some more in a future post.
part III starts out and ends with the famous Mexican Air Force IR video, which to my thinking is as solid a proof as you could possibly ask for -- objects invisible to the naked eye, captured by military-quality infrared gear, and seen by numerous qualified air force personnel. I ask you, skeptics, if that's not acceptable evidence, WTF is? What evidence would it take to convince you, if any? My guess is that most skeptics wouldn't believe it if the aliens landed on their garage.
The rest of part III deals with the supposed immanence of Disclosure by the U.S. government, which in an earlier post I expressed my doubt as to its likelihood. Governments have a singular dislike of admitting that they've been wrong, especially arrogant, conceited governments like ours. So don't hold your breath. But I'd love to be proved wrong....

several recent reports from UFOcasebook

I'm posting these because two concern photographs of the unusual 'boomerang' type UFO, another resembles the UFO 'fleet' video of Horn Lake MS, and the last is a report of yet another triangle:

Boomerang-shaped UFO photographed in unnamed CO location

four different photos of boomerang-ish UFOs in Tamaulipas, Mexico

several self-luminous object snapped in Sedona, AZ

report of a triangle UFO doing very UFO-ish things in Lake Elsinore, CA

several new still photos of interest

these are all from UFO Casebook, which is a great resource well worth perusing.

this one is the classic little old English lady UFO skeptic who only sees the UFO when her dog starts acting scared. She takes this tourist-perfect pic of a UFO next to some famous Brit cathedral.
If not for the accompanying testimony (always suspect, but not to be disregarded completely) it seems a bit too, as the English would say 'twee' for me, but I'll defer judgment until a photo analysis.

this one is a bit interesting, even though dating from three years ago, as it's one of those where the photographer didn't even see the object when he was taking the photo. Yet object there clearly is! The wacky French 'OVNI' blog that this came from is worth checking out too, if for no other reason that to see the only French person with no taste for design, at least not web design! This has got to be the most eye-searing site I've seen since 1995...

this one is from some amateur astronomer in Illinois (again Illinois! What's going on there?) from 3.20.09, when he caught some sort of object passing in front of the sun; again, skimpy but interesting photo evidence...

some kinda weird photo of something moving pretty quickly in the evening sky. From 3.17.09
These one-off photos are so limited in what they can tell us, most of the time.
But just the sheer weight of these reports has to mean something. Even if it is just a mass psychosis, as most skeptics would have us believe, why do we have that propensity? What is the nature of the sound and unshakeable belief that many UFO witnesses have that what they saw was not part of our normal reality?

Google Street view shows UK UFOs flying in formation 3.30.09

I would have said this is some sort of visual artifact from the Google Street View's automated camera, but perhaps not! Certainly worth investigating further....

contender for weirdest ever UFO photo

I'm making my way through Coast to Coast AM, which has an untamed wilderness of stuff on there, including quite a bit of decent UFO evidence as I'm discovering. 

This picture is easily one of the most bizarre UFO photos I've ever seen.

As evidence it's useful because of all the photographic detail the photographer, a pro, provides. 

5 pix of a brilliant object, Springfield Ill. 11.18.2006

Five UFO pix taken in Illinois 11 days after the O'hare cloud hole incident in '06.

I just stumbled accross a series of 5 photos that show something brilliant hovering in the sky over Springfield Illinois. The pix are ripe for analysis as they're pretty clear and there are trees and such for perspective. However the poster doesn't say much about the sighting itself.
Do yourself a favor and leave the sound off if you watch the video, which doesn't add anything other than to give you a slide show of the pix. That is unless you're a fan of cheesy soft rock music. :P